Article 310(1): Except as expressly provided by this Constitution, every person who is a member of a defence service or of a civil service of the Union or of an all-India service or holds any post connected with defence or any civil post under the Union holds office during the pleasure of the President, and every person who is a member of a civil service of a State or holds any civil post under a State holds office during thepleasure of the Governor _254*** of the State.
Ans to Q 16 should be Comptroller and Auditor General of India He can be removed from his office only on ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity in a manner a judge of the Supreme Court is removed i.e., each House of the Parliament passing a resolution supported by two-thirds of the members present and voting and by a majority of the house.
Anonymous
April 25, 2010 at 1:58 ambahut bahut dhanywaad.
Anonymous
April 25, 2010 at 2:05 amin question no.17 i think that article 311 is correct option…
plz. clarify
Admin
April 25, 2010 at 6:05 amArticle 310(1): Except as expressly provided by this Constitution, every person who is a member of a defence service or of a civil service of the Union or of an all-India service or holds any post connected with defence or any civil post under the Union holds office during the pleasure of the President, and every person who is a member of a civil service of a State or holds any civil post under a State holds office during thepleasure of the Governor _254*** of the State.
Anonymous
April 25, 2010 at 7:49 amin Q-19(A)….is it not the "constitution" that is supreme instead of the supreme court????? please clarify….
Anonymous
April 27, 2010 at 12:57 amQ. 16 type mismatch of NOT
Anonymous
April 30, 2010 at 7:42 amAns to Q 16 should be Comptroller and Auditor General of India
He can be removed from his office only on ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity in a manner a judge of the Supreme Court is removed i.e., each House of the Parliament passing a resolution supported by two-thirds of the members present and voting and by a majority of the house.
Anonymous
April 30, 2010 at 8:53 pmsuperb.
bharath
March 20, 2012 at 8:42 pmquestion no 2 third provision is wrong two or more states can have common high court