Cabinet extends term of Commission to examine the issue of sub-categorization of OBCs

The Union Cabinet has approved extension of term of Commission to examine the issue of sub-categorization of Other Backward Classes (OBCs), by 12 weeks i.e. upto 2 April, 2018.
The extension of tenure will enable Commission to submit a comprehensive report on issue of sub-categorization of OBCs, after consultation with various stakeholders.

Key Facts

The Commission headed by retired Chief Justice of Delhi High Court G. Rohini was constituted under Article 340 of Constitution with approval of President Ram Nath Kovind in October 2017. It was stipulated to submit its report within 12 weeks from assumption of charge by Chairperson. But it had sought extension of its term by 12 weeks, keeping in view voluminous data involved and time required for its analysis to prepare comprehensive report.

Sub-categorisation

Sub-categorisation of OBCs aims to ensure more equitable distribution of reservations in government jobs and educational institutions so that dominant groups among OBCs do not corner all benefits. The exercise will involve sub-categorisation of 5,000 castes in central OBC list.

Terms of reference of Commission

The commission will examine extent of inequitable distribution of benefits of reservation among castes included in broad category of OBCs, especially with reference to OBCs included in the Central list.
It will also take up exercise of identifying respective castes/sub-castes/communities synonyms in Central List of OBCs and classify them into their respective sub-categories. It will work out mechanism, norms, criteria and parameters, in scientific approach, for sub-categorization within such OBCs.

Background

The Supreme Court in Indra Sawhney and others vs. Union of India case (1992) had observed that there is no constitutional or legal bar on states for categorizing OBCs as backward or more backward. It had also observed that it is not impermissible in law if state chooses to do sub-categorization. So far, 9 states/UTs viz. Karnataka, Haryana, Andhra Pradesh, Jharkhand, Puducherry, Telangana, Wst Bengal, Bihar, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu have carried out sub-categorization of OBCs. So far there was no sub categorisation in central list of OBCs.


Month: 

No Comments

  1. Edrich Miranda

    December 21, 2017 at 6:46 pm

    The Brahmans, more particularly; besides, Kshatriyas and Vishnaues are aggrieved, over Indian Government’s policies, promoting casteism, and to add fuel to fire, a commission is appointed to further look into facilities to be extended to caste, which needs to be challenged at an international forum; because in this country there are such mechanisms in place which prohibit a fair contest.

    Reply
  2. Edrich Miranda

    December 21, 2017 at 6:46 pm

    The Brahmans, more particularly; besides, Kshatriyas and Vishnaues are aggrieved, over Indian Government’s policies, promoting casteism, and to add fuel to fire, a commission is appointed to further look into facilities to be extended to caste, which needs to be challenged at an international forum; because in this country there are such mechanisms in place which prohibit a fair contest.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *