UGC’s Draft Regulation on Equity in Higher Education

March 15, 2025

Recently, the University Grants Commission (UGC) released the ‘Draft University Grants Commission (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2025’. This regulation aims to combat discrimination in higher education based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It follows the Supreme Court’s directive linked to the cases of Rohit Vemula and Payal Tadvi. The UGC seeks to promote equity among stakeholders in higher education institutions (HEIs) through this initiative.

Purpose of the Regulation

The primary goal is to eradicate discrimination, especially against Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), socially and educationally backward classes, and economically weaker sections. The regulation aims to encourage inclusion and equity within HEIs.

Establishment of Equality Opportunity Centre

The regulation mandates the formation of an Equality Opportunity Centre in each HEI. This centre will have a Chairperson and nine members, including representatives from SC and ST categories. This structure is intended to ensure diverse representation in decision-making processes related to equity.

Role of Equity Squads and Ambassadors

HEIs are required to form subordinate bodies known as Equity Squads. Each unit must appoint an ‘Equity Ambassador’ to oversee initiatives aimed at promoting equity. These roles are designed to enhance awareness and address grievances related to discrimination.

Historical Context and Critique

The 2025 regulation is part of a series of UGC measures aimed at addressing social justice and discrimination. Previous initiatives, such as the Equal Opportunity Cell and the Students’ Grievance Redressal Committee, have had limited success. Critics argue that past regulations have not effectively tackled the underlying issues of caste-based discrimination within HEIs.

Data and Disparities

UGC reported the establishment of over 3,000 Equal Opportunity Cells and SC/ST Cells. However, the number of complaints resolved raises concerns about the effectiveness of these cells. With millions of SC/ST students enrolled, the reported figures suggest underreporting of discrimination incidents.

Continuing Challenges

Despite regulations, incidents of discrimination, humiliation, and violence against students from lower social orders persist. Data indicates a troubling trend of dropout rates and suicides among SC, ST, and OBC students in prestigious institutions. These statistics highlight the urgent need for more robust measures to ensure equity in education.

Societal Implications

The ongoing challenges to human dignity in educational settings reflect broader societal issues. The failure to address discrimination effectively undermines the educational ecosystem. The cases of Rohit Vemula and Payal Tadvi serve as stark reminders of the urgent need for change.

« Previous Post Next Post »